Has social media increased the quality of news and information
or decreased it?
Social media has neither increased nor decreased the quality
of news and information. There’s just more of it to be had, with even more
access to it. News sources have more methods to gain more information, but have
to do an equal amount of work to make sure that it is correct information. When
anyone can be a publisher, the integrity of the information must be thoroughly
questioned before it can be presented as fact.
With
microblogging tools, such as Twitter, it’s easy to spread small amounts of information
to a large audience. However, with such a limited method of communicating
information, it commonly ends up being misinterpreted, and then further spread
throughout the online community. For example, actor Mark Hamill (famously known
as Luke Skywalker and the dominant voice actor of The Joker) had tweeted that his portrayal of
The Joker in Batman: Arkham City would be his last, leading his thousands of followers to
believe that he was retiring the voice of The Joker for good. This later turned
out to not be true, as he clarified in a later tweet.
Social media has allowed information to be exchanged rapidly, and reaching larger audiences. This creates a lot of room for error in interpretation, and in communicating in the first place. It hasn't really changed the quality of news and information; it has changed the quantity.